Design / Decisions across a project

Choices in Turbine Design

Design approaches can address potential wildlife interactions through site selection, project configuration and operational planning. Their intended role is to reduce exposure or support a response to observed activity; applicability and effectiveness require context-specific review.

PlanSite and layout
ConsiderRotor and visibility
AdaptOperations

Compare design levers

Apply approaches with site context

Design choices are not interchangeable. Local wildlife information, project constraints and applicable guidance should inform whether a measure is appropriate and how its performance can be reviewed.

Siting and layout

Project planning can use habitat, topography, migration context and survey evidence to identify potential areas of concern. Adjusting turbine locations or layout may be considered where it is feasible and supported by site-specific assessment.

Integrate wildlife information early

Early review can help project teams consider ecological constraints before design decisions become difficult to change. Survey findings should be interpreted with attention to timing, coverage and uncertainty.

Match measures to the identified risk

Describe the pathway by which a proposed measure is intended to reduce potential impact. Avoid assuming that a measure suited to one site, species or season will perform in the same way elsewhere.

Plan for implementation and review

Identify responsibilities, monitoring needs and the conditions under which a design or operating approach may be revisited. Practical arrangements are part of an assessable design.

Design principle

Use a layered approach

Measures may work together across siting, design and operation. A layered approach should explain how its elements relate and how potential gaps will be addressed.

Next consideration

Assess intended protections

Review implementation and evidence to understand whether the selected approach is serving its intended role.

Review impact evaluation